(General Studies III – Economy Section – Indian Economy and issues relating to Planning, Mobilization of Resources, Growth, Development and Employment. Inclusive Growth and issues arising from it.)
- In the run-up to the Union Budget, The Chief Ministers of Bihar and Andhra Pradesh, respectively have demanded special financial packages for their respective States.
- Special Category Status (SCS) is a classification given by the Centre to assist development of states that face geographical and socio-economic disadvantages.
Provisions for Special Category Status (SCS)?
- SCS for plan assistance was granted in the past by the National Development Council of the erstwhile Planning Commission.
- The Constitution does not make a provision for SCS and this classification was later done on the recommendations of the 5th Finance Commission in 1969.
Gadgil formula for awarding Special Category Status (SCS) –
- Hilly Terrain
- Low Population Density and/or Sizeable Share of Tribal Population
- Strategic Location along Borders with Neighbouring Countries
- Economic and Infrastructure Backwardness
- Non-viable Nature of State finances.
Benefits of Special Category Status –
- 90% of all state expenditures for all centrally sponsored programs and outside assistance are covered by the central government, and the remaining 10% is given to the state as a zero-interest loan.
- For states in the general category, the typical loan-to-grant ratio is 70% loan and 30% grant.
- These states have access to programs for debt reduction and debt exchange.
- To entice investment, states with Special Category Status are excluded from excise taxes, customs taxes, corporate taxes, income taxes, and other taxes.
- When it comes to receiving central funds, states are given preference, attracting development projects there.
- States have the option to carry over any unused funds from one fiscal year to the following without having them expire.
Concerns Related to Special Category Status?

- Resource Allocation: Granting SCS entails providing additional financial assistance to the state, which can strain the central government’s resources. SCS might lead to disparities or dissatisfaction among non-SCS states.
- Dependency on Central Assistance: This could potentially discourage efforts toward self-sufficiency and independent economic growth strategies.
- Implementation Challenges: Due to administrative inefficiencies, corruption, or lack of proper planning. Ensuring that the allocated funds are used for intended purposes is a significant challenge.
Way Forward –
- There is a need to encourage states to create comprehensive development plans that focus on sustainable growth, job creation, infrastructure, etc.
- Encourage states to generate their revenue streams.
- Policies for gradually reducing states’ dependency on central assistance.
We need to channelise more resources for higher capital investment in the poorer regions of the country for balanced regional development. The rationale for special status is that certain states, because of inherent features, have a low resource base and cannot mobilize resources for development. It is time to revisit the criteria and include other states into this exclusive category by excluding those who do not need such assistance any longer.