Search
Close this search box.

Power of Expunction

Article 105: Powers, privileges, etc., of the Houses of Parliament and of the members and committees there of –

  1. Subject to the Constitution and parliamentary rules, members have freedom of speech in Parliament.
  2. MPs are not liable in court for anything said or voted on in Parliament or its committees, nor for any publication by Parliament.
  3. The powers, privileges, and immunities of Parliament and its members will be defined by law and, until then, are those in effect before the Constitution (Forty-fourth Amendment) Act 1978.
  4. These provisions apply equally to those with the right to speak or participate in Parliament as they do to MPs.
  • The first special session of the 18th Lok Sabha saw heated discussions, with the Opposition clashing with the government over various issues. The session concluded with a dispute over the expunction of remarks by Opposition leaders in both Houses.
  • Expunction of Remarks in Parliament
  • Parliament maintains a verbatim record of proceedings, with MPs enjoying certain privileges under Article 105 of the Constitution.
  • However, words deemed “defamatory, indecent, unparliamentary, or undignified” can be expunged by the presiding officer—Chairman in the Upper House and Speaker in the Lower House.
  • Chairman and Speaker can expunge remarks under Rule 261 (Rajya Sabha) and Rules 380 and 381 (Lok Sabha).
  • Expunged portions are marked by asterisks with footnotes, and a comprehensive list is circulated to media outlets.
  • The Lok Sabha Secretariat keeps a comprehensive list of ‘unparliamentary’ words and expressions.
  • Rules ensure discipline, and when the Chair deems a word unparliamentary, it must be withdrawn immediately without debate.
  • Speakers can order the expunction of words prejudicial to national interest, detrimental to foreign relations, derogatory to dignitaries, offensive to national sentiments, or likely to bring the House into ridicule.
  • Members must withdraw objectionable remarks irrelevant to the debate upon the Chair’s request, or face expunction.
  • Quoting unreferenced documents or speaking after being asked to desist can also lead to expunction.
  • Remarks Against MPs
  • Rule 353 of the Lok Sabha outlines the procedure for allegations against colleagues or outsiders, requiring advance notice for inquiry.
  • The rule does not apply to allegations against government ministers, as Parliament holds them accountable.

Dig Deeper: Read about the Loksabha Secretariat, its role and responsibilities.

FAO on India’s Aquaculture

The Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) has offered its expertise to address the impact of climate change on India’s aquaculture…

UNICEF State of the World’s Children 2024 (SOWC-2024)

The SOWC-2024 report warns of an unprecedented planetary crisis affecting nearly half of the world’s children (one billion), living in…

2nd India-CARICOM Summit

Prime Minister Modi, during his visit to Guyana for the second India-CARICOM Summit. The summit focused on collaboration in trade,…

Access to Nutrition Initiative (ATNi)

Global Access to Nutrition Index 2024It is 5th report assessing 30 of the world’s largest food and beverage (F&B) manufacturers –…

Delhi Solar Portal and PM Surya Ghar Muft Bijli Yojana

The Delhi Solar Portal was launched to promote rooftop solar panel installations, enabling residents to generate power and reduce electricity…

GM Crops: A Sustainable Solution to Food Security or a Double-Edged Sword?

GM Crops: A Sustainable Solution to Food Security or a Double-Edged Sword? (General Studies III – Science & Technology section…